Facebook developing mobile location-tracking app: Report

Summary: Facebook is reportedly developing an application that will track where its users are, even when the app is not open on a user's mobile phone.

Facebook is working on a new application that would track the location of its users through their mobile devices, according to Bloomberg.

The social networking giant is reportedly due to release the app by the middle of March. The app will help users find nearby friends, and continue to track a user's location when the app isn't open. Facebook declined to comment for the Bloomberg report.

The app is reportedly being developed by engineers from Glancee, a startup that Facebook acquired in mid-2012. Before Facebook took down the Glancee app from the App Store, it alerted users when people with similar interests were nearby.

Any such app will be closely scrutinised by the already Facebook-weary privacy advocates. Facebook's announcement last month of a Graph Search, a new, more refined method of searching, was quickly criticised for the apparent privacy intrusion built into it. A Tumblr was quickly created collecting actual search results from Graph Search to show how easy it was to target people with specific interests, such as men who like men living in Iran, or the employers of people who like racism.

Apple's Find My Friends and Google's Latitude already allow users to track each other's locations.

Topics: Social Enterprise, Mobility

Hackers hit U.S. Department of Energy

The U.S. Department of Energy said that hackers have stolen personal data of its employees and contractors.

The U.S. Department of Energy has confirmed that its computer systems were hacked into last month. According to The New York Times, the federal agency sent around an internal e-mail on Friday telling its employees about the cyberattack.

"The Department of Energy has just confirmed a recent cyber incident that occurred in mid-January which targeted the Headquarters' network and resulted in the unauthorized disclosure of employee and contractor Personally Identifiable Information," the e-mail said.

The agency said that it is working to figure out the "nature and scope of the incident" but that so far it believes "no classified data was compromised." It's unclear which divisions within the Department of Energy were attacked or who was behind the hack.

The Department of Energy is in charge of much of the country's vital infrastructure, such as energy production, nuclear reactor production, and radioactive waste disposal. It has troves of classified and sensitive data that if leaked could be detrimental to the country's security. According to Reuters, the most highly classified information is stored on networks that aren't connected to the Internet.

The head of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano recently announced that she believes a wave of cyberattacks on U.S. infrastructure is a serious possibility. Dubbing such an event a "cyber 9/11," Napolitano warned that cyberterrorists could take down the nation's power grid, water infrastructure, transportation networks, and financial networks.Related stories

While it doesn't seem like the January cyberattack on the Department of Energy compromised any data or infrastructure, it does show that hackers were able to breach the government's computer systems. In the e-mail, the agency said it is working to fortify itself against future attacks.

"Once the full nature and extent of this incident is known, the Department will implement a full remediation plan," the e-mail said. "The Department is also leading an aggressive effort to reduce the likelihood of these events occurring again. These efforts include leveraging the combined expertise and capabilities of the Department's Joint Cybersecurity Coordination Center to address this incident, increasing monitoring across all of the Department's networks and deploying specialized defense tools to protect sensitive assets."

CNET contacted the Department of Energy for comment. We'll update the story when we get more information.

Cabdiraxmaan yuusuf Ducaale "Boobe" oo si diiran uga hadlayey arimaha ictiraafka Somalia

WARAYSIGAN oo ay qaaday shabkadaa calamiga ah ee Hadhwanagnews hadaad oo nayso isaga oo dhamays tiran



                                                              GUJI HALKAN

Obama's Post-Partisan Promise Mellows Amid First Term Gridlock

WASHINGTON -- As President Barack Obama enters his second term, his aides have concluded he likely will fall short on one of his signature promises.

Barring some collectively cathartic Beltway experience, the Obama administration will not usher in an era of post-partisanship. The forces of gridlock continue to have the upper hand, and they will have a tangible impact on the president's tactics and ambitions.

Obama and his aides are neither fretting nor apologizing. Rather, while expressing a continued preference for politics by consensus, they are embracing the need for a more aggressive, even confrontational approach. The president signaled as much by vowing simply to not negotiate with Republicans over raising the debt ceiling. He upped the ante with the introduction of his gun policy reforms, which were more comprehensive than expected.

The message was solidified this past week with the announcement that Obama for America -- the organization that lifted the president to two election victories -- would be converted to a non-profit entity for the express purpose of pushing the White House's agenda in Obama's second term. One senior administration official was practically giddy about the prospect of using the organization's massive email list for policy purposes, admitting the campaign group had failed to do so effectively during the president's first term.

The White House has made similar boasts before, so skeptics have their reasons. But this time, a dysfunctional Washington and a weakened but more dogmatic Republican Party make a combative strategy the best option.

"Obviously, we hoped for something better," conceded David Axelrod, Obama's longtime adviser, in an interview. “And to the extent that the president can do more, he will. But this is largely a function of a decision on the Republican Party to try and thwart him at every turn as a political strategy."

As for the next term, "I think a lot of it will end up having to do with how the Republican Party sees the future," Axelrod added. "Survival is a strong instinct. If Republicans think there is a political advantage to them personally to continue this Manichean struggle, then that doesn't bode well."

For Axelrod, this is no small admission. As the chief architect of Obama's public image, he molded the concept of post-partisanship into a campaign theme in 2008. And as the president's right-hand man during the first two years in the White House, he held firm to the idea that political comity wasn't just a means to an end, but an end-goal in its own right.

But gridlock has a way of grinding down even the most idealistic soul. During Obama's first term, Republicans rebuffed the president time and again. Eventually, the president's aides concluded that more could be done working around or against Congress, rather than with it.

The seeds of that approach -- which involve barnstorming outside the Beltway, urging voters to pressure elected officials, and taking harder lines for negotiations -- were planted during the payroll tax cut fight in early 2012 and bloomed during the fiscal cliff standoff at year's end. With high-stakes budget fights over the debt ceiling, government funding, and sequestration coming in the first few months of 2013, the more combative Obama will be front and center once more.

"The president took the case directly to the American people and involved them more fully in the discussion," Axelrod said of the payroll tax cut and fiscal cliff fights. "I do think that was a significant change and one that is still very much available to the president. Not just available to him. I think he is convinced that is essential going forward."

The outsider approach, however, only softens the opposition so much. Buffered by redistricting and skittish about inviting primary challenges, some Republicans never feel the public pressure the president applies. At some point -- as the White House concluded during the closing days of the fiscal cliff standoff, when it dispatched Vice President Joe Biden to negotiate with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) -- the administration has to return to the inside game, sit down and cut a deal.

Looking at the legislative map, there appear to be few opportunities for such dealmaking in the second term. The White House has refused, as a matter of principle, to negotiate over the debt ceiling. But it will likely make concessions elsewhere to avoid a government shutdown. Axelrod did predict a constructive compromise on immigration reform. "It would be a suicidal impulse for Republicans in Congress to continue to block that," he said.

But getting to "yes" with the GOP on other topics will require a bit of legislative craft. The macro solutions, such as changing the way congressional districts are drawn, won't happen till after Obama leaves office. On a micro level, White House allies are pushing for the administration to engage directly with individual Republicans rather than the leadership of the party, in hopes of building majority support for legislation by peeling off moderate members of the GOP. The underlying theory is that it's better to find consensus with a few than to fail with the mass.

"He campaigned as someone who was a pragmatist and willing to negotiate to move an agenda forward," said Jen Psaki, who served as a spokeswoman for both the White House and the 2012 campaign. But there were always limits. Inside the White House, she added, "there is a recognition that there are only so many hours that you can spend sitting around the table talking to or at people who have no interest in helping you."

Back in 2008, the concept of a post-partisan Washington did not seem all that unfeasible. Obama's political rise was premised on a pledge to sand down government's sharp, depressing edges. Voters flocked to the idea.

But not everyone was a believer. Upon leaving his post on Obama's transition team as a liaison to progressive groups, Mike Lux warned that pursuing a post-partisan norm would make for a rudderless first term. Major change, he argued, required partisan "rancor."

Looking back, Lux said it "seemed so obvious to me."

"There are many predictions I make where I have some doubt about them. That wasn't one," he added. "I'm not sure [post-partisanship] is the right goal. I'm not sure it was ever the right goal."

Few have questioned the president's sincerity in trying.

It started before Obama was sworn in. In the days before his inauguration, helavished praise on the man he defeated, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), and broke bread with conservative columnists, many of whom had been critical of his candidacy.

"It was a strong attempt to send a signal during the transition that he was going to reach out to both sides," recalled one former aide. "There was a sense of a new beginning and giving each other a chance."

But that sense dissipated quickly. Top GOP leaders had concluded, on the night of his inauguration, that their path back to power lay in lockstep opposition. When it came time for Obama to push his economic stimulus package, House Republicans united against it.

The president's health care reform push faced a similar reception, only passing through political perseverance and a quirk of parliamentary rules. The political costs were severe. The 2010 midterm elections were a disaster for the president.

The White House nevertheless tried its hand at post-partisanship again. The president concluded that to succeed with any legislative items in the second half of his first term, he needed to show willingness to give ground on deficit reduction first.

Republicans weren't impressed. Two showdowns (one over shutting down the government, the other over defaulting on the country's debt) marked 2011. A grand bargain proved elusive. By the time 2012 rolled around, so too did another presidential campaign. Gridlock persevered.

That it did was, in one sense, a product of the times. The debates over the size and role of government are more bitter during times of massive deficits and lingering unemployment.

But the problems Obama faced were more complex than that. Longtime Republican strategist Mark McKinnon, who refused to help McCain in '08 because he was so drawn to Obama's message, argued that this White House simply got caught in same partisan undercurrents as administrations of the past.

"I think about it a lot," McKinnon said in an interview. "The interesting thing to me is the parallel between [George W.] Bush and Obama. If you compare the speeches between Obama in '07 and Bush in early-'99, you couldn't tell the difference. It was so much about changing the tone and culture in Washington. Now, they both failed on that goal and for similar and different reasons.

"President Bush failed because of the [Florida] recount. The well was just poisoned from the beginning ... which is not to say that he isn't culpable. But the point is that when he came in, with a message and a mission to change Washington, he hit a brick wall. With Obama, it was really the birthers. You had a significant enough portion of the body politic who didn't see the president as legitimate and who therefore created a crowbar for hyper-partisanship."

Those who experienced the process more directly extend the finger-pointing beyond the birther crowd. As former White House communications director Anita Dunn put it in an interview: "It takes two to be post-partisan." The Republican Party, she said, felt "it wasn't in their interest to work in a post-partisan way."

Now, as they prepare for another four years, aides to Obama have refined their approach to political gridlock. Instead of something that can be swept aside with appeals to the greater good, it must be chipped at systematically. It's a more cynical take than in 2008, but not utterly dark or depressing.

Those who know Obama best insist that he isn't giving up on the notion of post-partisanship. Pressing the idea is a useful public relations tactic, they argued, portraying opponents as hopelessly intractable if they don't bend. Moreover, the public still wants him to try. According to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll, 39 percent of respondents want the president to cooperate more with Republicans. Only 22 percent want him to cooperate less; 16 percent think he cooperates too much and 38 percent think he doesn't cooperate enough.

Sony Will Introduce Xperia Tablet to Challenge Apple, Samsung

Sony Corp. (6758), the electronics maker struggling after four straight annual losses, will introduce a tablet computer in Japan this year as it tries to lure customers away from Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Samsung Electronics Co.
The Xperia Tablet Z will be 6.9 millimeters (.27 inches) thick, weigh 495 grams (17 ounces) and have a 10.1-inch (26- centimeter) display, Sony’s mobile unit said in a statement today. The waterproof device may debut in Japan as soon as March before appearing elsewhere, Noriko Shoji, a Tokyo-based spokeswoman for Sony, said by phone today. The price hasn’t been determined, she said.
Sony Chief Executive Officer Kazuo Hirai is focusing on mobile devices to revive the company, whose TV unit has been unprofitable for eight straight fiscal years. The Tokyo-based company introduced its first tablet model in 2011, making it the last among the world’s top 10 laptop makers to tap the surging demand triggered by Apple’s iPad.
Worldwide tablet shipments will total 120 million units this year and may reach 340 million by 2016, according to market researcher IHS Inc.’s iSuppli.
In October, Apple introduced a smaller version of the iPad with a 7.9-inch screen and prices starting at $329. Sony also faces competition with Amazon.com Inc.’s updated set of Kindle Fires and Google Inc.’s Nexus 7.
Sony shares rose 3.3 percent to close at 1,187 yen in Tokyo after the announcement, extending their gain this month to 24 percent. Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 Stock Average fell 1.5 percent today.
To contact the reporter on this story: Mariko Yasu in Tokyo at myasu@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Tighe at mtighe4@bloomberg.net.

Oxfam says world's rich could end poverty

UK-based charity says the world's 100 richest people earned enough in 2012 to end global poverty four times over.

The world's richest one percent have seen their income increase by 60 percent in the last 20 years [EPA]

The world's 100 richest people earned enough money last year to end world extreme poverty four times over, according to a new report released by international rights group and charity Oxfam. The $240 billion net income of the world's 100 richest billionaires would have ended poverty four times over, according to the London-based group's report released on Saturday. The group has called on world leaders to commit to reducing inequality to the levels it was at in 1990, and to curb income extremes on both sides of the spectrum. The release of the report was timed to coincide with the holding of the World Economic Forum in Davos next week. The group says that the world's richest one percent have seen their income increase by 60 percent in the last 20 years, with the latest world financial crisis only serving to hasten, rather than hinder, the process. "We sometimes talk about the 'have-nots' and the 'haves' - well, we're talking about the 'have-lots'. [...] We're anti-poverty agency. We focus on poverty, we work with the poorest people around the world. You don't normally hear us talking about wealth. But it's gotten so out of control between rich and poor that one of the obstacles to solving extreme poverty is now extreme wealth," Ben Phillips, a campaign director at Oxfam, told Al Jazeera. 'Global new deal' "We can no longer pretend that the creation of wealth for a few will inevitably benefit the many – too often the reverse is true," said Jeremy Hobbs, an executive director at Oxfam. "Concentration of resources in the hands of the top one per cent depresses economic activity and makes life harder for everyone else – particularly those at the bottom of the economic ladder. "In a world where even basic resources such as land and water are increasingly scarce, we cannot afford to concentrate assets in the hands of a few and leave the many to struggle over what’s left." Hobbs said that "a global new deal" is required, encompassing a wide array of issues, from tax havens to employment laws, in order to address income inequality. Closing tax havens, the group said, could yield an additional $189bn in additional tax revenues. According to Oxfam's figures, as much as $32 trillion is currently stored in tax havens. In a statement, Oxfam warned that "extreme wealth and income is not only unethical it is also economically inefficient, politically corrosive, socially divisive and environmentally destructive."

BREAKING NEWS: Janet Jackson CONVERTED TO ISLAM . . . In Preparation For Her $20M Wedding!!

This is to make a final wake up call or reminder for those who have been misled and ridiculed for the so-called Greater Somalia.There is nothing wrong with having peace in Somalia, but reunification is a dream of the past and will never happen until a living camel manages to pass through the thread-hole of the needle. Somaliland has already taken its decision voted by all its people, no need of people like outsiders who are daydreaming of impossible missions that will never takeplace until the whole world perishes.
Southerners should mind their own words, there is and will never be a so-called greater Somalia unless you are being fooled or brainwashed and be careful on wasting your time on false and never practical dreams. And for my beloved Somalilanders, resilience and patience are the key attributes to these dark times and hardwork and optimism will pave the way for our unquestioned goal which is RECOGNITION.

Regulator says no to Obama mortgage write-down plan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top housing regulator rebuffed a plan by the Obama administration to cut mortgages held by struggling homeowners, a blow to the White House, which is keen to show voters it can help fix the housing market.

The regulator for government-run housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said on Tuesday that using taxpayer-funded bank bailout money could encourage defaults and not make a big improvement in reducing foreclosures in a cost-effective way for taxpayers.

"The anticipated benefits do not outweigh the costs and risks," said the Federal Housing Finance Agency's head Edward DeMarco, who has come under intense pressure from the government to agree to the plan.

The regulator's decision drew an immediate rebuke from the Obama administration and Democratic lawmakers. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner disputed the agency's conclusions and urged DeMarco to reconsider his decision.

The housing market started deteriorating in 2006 and wiped out trillions of dollars in equity. Although the market has shown signs of recovery, about 11 million homeowners owe more than their properties are worth and the Obama administration has struggled with various taxpayer-funded programs to keep people in their homes.

"I do not believe it is the best decision for the country," Geithner told DeMarco in a letter released to the media.

The use of targeted principal reduction would "provide much needed help to a significant number of troubled homeowners, help repair the nation's housing market and result in a net benefit to taxpayers," Geithner said.

Despite several plans to tackle the country's housing problems, most of which is focused on giving homeowners the opportunity to refinance at lower interest rates, the administration has yet to come up with a plan to stabilize the market.

Obama, a Democrat, is trying to convince voters ahead of the November presidential election that his policies have helped the economy recover from dire days of the financial crisis and ensuing recession. His Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, has said the foreclosure process should be allowed to run its course and hit the bottom.

United flight temporarily diverted because of camera

(Reuters) - A "suspicious item," which turned out to be a camera, caused a United Airlines flight bound for Geneva, Switzerland, to be temporarily diverted to Boston on Tuesday night, according to officials.
Flight 956 from Newark, New Jersey, landed safely at Logan International Airport in Boston at about 9:10 p.m. so authorities could investigate a "suspicious item," Massachusetts Port Authority spokesman Richard Walsh said.
Passengers were taken off the plane and state police scanned the aircraft, Walsh said.
The troublesome item turned out to be a camera, which was x-rayed and cleared, Massachusetts State Police Trooper Thomas Murphy said. Passengers reboarded the plane, which took off again for Switzerland at approximately 10:30 p.m., Murphy said.
A spokesperson for United Airlines was not immediately available for comment.
(Reporting By Mary Wisniewski; Editing by Greg McCune and Stacey Joyce)

one of the amazing arts....

d

Ethiopian Airlines to Start New Services to Berbera

Flights to Hargeisa differed as Renovation of Runway not Complete
Press Release
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Airlines, the fastest growing airline in Africa, is pleased to announce the start of new flights to Berbera, the port city of Somaliland, as of July 1, 2012. Ethiopian will fly to Berbera daily using its Q400 aircraft, with three morning and four afternoon flights.
Ethiopian’s addition of Berbera to its network will bring its international destinations in Africa to 43, excluding its 17 domestic points, thus further solidifying Ethiopian’s position as the airline that provides the most convenient connection to and from Africa.
The resumption of flights to Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland, scheduled for June 10, 2012 has been differed as renovation of runway at Hargeisa airport has not been completed. Once the renovation at Hargeisa airport is completed, Ethiopian plans to start flights immediately.
Berbera, a seaport town with the only sheltered harbor on the Southside of the Gulf of Aden, is playing an increasing role as an alternative sea trading door for the East Africa region. It is the most important city in Somaliland next to its capital city Hargeisa.
Ethiopian’s addition of Berbera to its network, in addition to strengthening trade networks in East Africa, will enable international travelers from the Middle East, Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas a much more convenient and easy access to the Somalia Region.
About Ethiopian
Ethiopian Airlines, the fastest growing airline in Africa, made its maiden international flight to Cairo in 1946 and now the Airline provides dependable services to 65 international destinations spanning four continents.
Ethiopian is proud to be a Star Alliance Member. The Star Alliance network is the leading global airline network offering customers convenient worldwide reach and a smoother travel experience. The Star Alliance network offers more than 20,000 daily flights to 1,293 airports in 190 countries.
Ethiopian is a multi-award winner for its commitment and contributions towards the development and growth of the African aviation industry and in recognition of its distinguished long-haul operations enhanced by the introduction of new routes and products. Recently, Ethiopian won Gold in the African Airline of the Year 2011/2012 Awards organized by the African Aviation News Portal. Ethiopian also received the 2011 AFRAA award for being consistently profitable over the years and has won the “AFRICAN CARGO AIRLINE OF THE YEAR 2011 Award” for its excellence in air cargo. Ethiopian also won the NEPAD Transport Infrastructure Excellence Awards 2009 and “the Airline of the Year 2009 Award” from the African Airlines Association (AFRAA).
With its acquisition of and firm orders for several new modern fleet, the airline is well positioned to pursue aggressively the implementation of its 2025 strategic plan to become the leading aviation group in Africa.

amazing story do you beleive!!??

NEW YORK(HWN):Inkastoo dunidu ay dhaqaalo xumo wajaheyso ayaa hadana mararka qaar waxaa muuqanaya sida ay ukala sareeyaan dadyowga aduunka.

Bruce Campbell waa nin udhashay wadanka mareykanka waxana uu kasoo jeedaa gobalka Oregon waxaana uu hoy ka dhigtay ama gurigii udagan yahay ka dhigtay diyaarad weyn oo ah nuuca Boing 727.

Koox saxafiyiin ah oo ka tirsan CNN-ka ayaa booqatay guriga diyaarada ah ee ninkaan waxaana markii ay la kulmeen uu usheegay in uu waligiis ku riyoonayay in uu kasoo dhex tooso guri diyaarad ah ayna uromoowday.

Diyaarada ayaa la sheegay in uu dhigtay meel keyn ah oo ku taala gobalka Oregon,waxaana la sheegay in labada baal ee diyaarada uu mid jaran jaro ka dhigtay lagu soo galo gurigiisa.

Waxaa la sheegay in uu ku kordhiyay hal musqul oo gooni ugu qubeysto ,isagoo dadka soo booqda si weyn halkaa ugu soo dhoweya.

Eng. Xaashi Wasiirkii Hore Ee Maaliyadda Oo Ka Qaybgalka Xukuumadda Somaliland Ee Shirarka Soomaalida Iyo Wadahadalada Ku Tilmaamay Murkacasho Siyaasadeed Oo Aan Loo Baahnayn

Hargeysa(ANN) Eng Maxamed Xaashi Cilmi oo ahaa Wasiirkii hore ee Maaliyadda xukuumadda Somaliland ee Madaxweyne Siilaanyo, ayaa ku tilmaamay shirarka Somaliland ka qaybgashay ee London iyo Istanbuul kuwo muujinaya murkucasho siyaasadeed. Sidaa awgeed ku taliyay

inay xukuumaddu ka noqto wadahadaladii Somalia.
Eng Maxamed Xaashi oo ka mid ahaa Wasiiradii Madaxweyne Siilaanyo ka caydhiyay xukuumaddiisa horaantii sanadkan,  ayaa  saluug weyn ka muujiyey hanaankii Somaliland uga qayb-gashay shirarkaa oo ka qaybgalkooda uu ku tilmaamay inay mid muujinayay inay Madaxda Somaliland hoos geeyeen  masuuliyiinta TFG-da.
Eng Maxamed Xaashi oo maanta  shir-jaraa’id ku qabtay gurigiisa Hargeysa,  ayaa sidoo kale muujiyey sida aanu u jeclaysan shakhsiyaadka reer Somaliland ee mararka ay Somaliya ka hadlayaan adeegsada weedha ah “Walaalaheen”, isagoo tilmaamay in kalmadaasi ay tahay mid aan meesha ku jirin, maadaama buu yidhi ay dadkaasi dhibaato laxaadle u geysteen shacabka reer Somaliland.
Wuxuuna isagoo arrimahaa ka hadlaya yidhi,   “Inaga wixii inagu dhacay iyagga (Koonfurta Somaliya) kuma dhicin, waxa kale oo dhacay adduunkii 700 ilaa 800 oo sanadood la ururinayey waatii la boobay ee la gurtay, imikana inagu waxaynu nidhaahnaa walaaladeen, kalmadaasina inay meesha soo gasho may ahayn, waayo walaaladaa inay sidaa kuu galaan may ahayn ee inay kuu hiiliyaan ayay ahayd, markaa kalmada walaaladeen waa mid aan meesha qabanba”ayuu yidhi waxaanu intaa ku daray “Dalka markii aynu ku soo noqonay 1991-kii Magaalooyinku way wada burbursanaayeen, laakiin dib u dhiskoodii muddo inagumuu qaadan oo kumaynaan nasiib xumayn, markii aynu dawladnimadeenii la soo noqonay waxaynu la nimid fikir odhanaya Somaliya waynu ka wada hadlaynaa wixii inaga dhxeeyay iyo sidii aynu u noqon lahayn laba dawladood oo jaar ah, laakiin imika taasi waa arin aan aad loo tafsiirin,  lamana  odhan maxaynu ka wada hadlaynaa ee waynu wada hadlaynaa ayuun-baa la yidhaahdaa, maaha in dhibaatadii aynu xoriyada u marnay iyo intii dad inagaga dhimatay iyo intii xoolo la inagaga dhacay in maanta si dhibyar loo yidhaahdo way soo noqonayaan wax meesha ku jira maaha, laakiin waxa aynu ka wada hadlaynay waxay ahayd wixii inaga dhexeeyay ee may ahayn isku noqosho, imikana waxaad moodaa in mowqifkii wax iska bedaleen oo arinkii shisheeye daraf inaga soo galay oo shirarkan imika la wado waa shirar ay hogaaminayaan dawlado shisheeye, dawladahaasina waxay  arrintii ka dhigeen sidii aynu heshiinayno, madaxda Somaliyana sidaas ayay uga hadashaa. Marka laga soo bilaabo shirkii London iyo kii Istanbul waxaad arkaysaa soofadaran habow.”
Eng Maxamed Xaashi Cilmi oo sharaxaya wadahadalka Somaliland iyo Somalia, waxa uu yidhi,  “Waxaynu bedalnay siyaasadii ahayd lalama hadli karo ilaa ay dhistaan dawlad dadku soo doortay oo lagu kalsoon yahay, tan imika markaad eegto talaba ma hayaan oo waa loo talinayaa, markaa mowqifkaa cusub ee la leeyahay aynu la shirno oo aynu dhex fadhiisano, marka aad ka soo qaado shirkii London, Madaxwaynaheenu waxa uu tagay isaga oo Madaxwayne ah,  laakiin markii uu shirka galay Shariifka ayaa Madaxwayne inoo ahaa ilayn la inama ictiraafsanee, shirkii Istanbul-na wasiirradeenii tagay iyaga ayaa  u madax ahaa (TFG-da), waayo dadka shirkaasi joogay Somaliya ayay dawlad ahaan u aaminsan yihiin,  markaa halkaa khasaare ayaa inoogu jira, inaga oo ay tahay inaynu wada hadal la yeelano dad umaddu soo dooratay oo wax ka go’aan”ayuu yidhi.
Wuxuuna soo qaatay qaabka ay madaxda dawladda Taagatadaran uga hadlaan dhibaatadii shacbiga Somaliland loo geystay, isagoo yidhi, “Marka ay ka hadlayaan dhibaatadii ina gaadhay waxay yidhaahdaan cid walba waxbaa gaadhay, waxay yasayaan dhibaatadii ay inagu sameeyeen, laakiin iyagu (shacabka Koonfurta) is-gaadhsiiyey dhibaatada, laakiin inaga dawladii dalka (Taliskii Siyaad Barre) ayaa ina gaadhsiiyay.
Waxaan ku talin lahaa fikradeenii hore ee ahayd in lala hadlo marka ay wax noqdaan, waayo imika in lala fadhiisto ayaa ceeb ah, waxaanad moodaa in wada hadalkii inaga qaloocday, waxaanan leeyahay aynu arrinkaa dib ugu noqono oo aynu danteenii u soo noqono oo marka cid ay doortaan ee ay masuul noqdaan wixii ka wada hadlayno aynu ka wada hadalno.”
“Haddii aynu teena ku guulaysan waynu inaynu ta xun u diyaar-garowno ayaa inala gudboon oo aynaan wakhti iskaga lumin nimankan aan cidna matalin, waxaanan qabbaa inaynu ka soo noqono murgacashada inagu timid labadii shir ee London iyo Istanbul”ayuu yidhi. Eng. Xaashi isagoo ka talinaya haddii arrimuhu noqdaan kuwo madhalays ah.